Post by A FriendPost by Louis EpsteinPost by A FriendPost by Louis EpsteinPost by A FriendPost by Louis EpsteinPost by t***@iwvisp.comPost by Louis EpsteinGoogle News had a story about some "Elliot Page"
announcing "he is transgender"...it turns out it's
Ellen Page of "Juno" fame who announced she was a
lesbian a few years ago.
DNA tests,NOT egos,are the determinant of pronoun
gender!
Very odd that almost all media jumped on the new name and sexual
identification,
and many with no ?Ellen? reference at all, e.g. ?Elliot, who starred in
?Juno?...?
IMDb is also calling her "Elliot" with no reference to her birth name
in the bio,even as its list of her credits puts "(as Ellen Page)"
after everything.
So?
So shame on them.
Post by A FriendPost by Louis EpsteinPost by A FriendPost by Louis EpsteinOne of the loudest and most desperate whines of the "trans"
apologists is that it's SOOOOOOOO important not to call the
people by the name they've used until their public claim not
to be what their genes dictate that they must be.
The fragility of the web of deception is meant to motivate us
to panic-stricken efforts to avoid disturbing it.
They say Trump supporters are petty and small-minded, but they've got
nothing on you, Horace.
"A mind so open your brains fall out" is nothing to be proud of,
and it's clearly indicated by credulity toward trans-propaganda.
Your pronouncement about DNA tests being the only arbiter of gender is
a non-starter. (Tell us, what was the arbiter before DNA testing?
Simple possession of a tallywhacker?)
There's nothing particularly open-minded about treating Page or other
trans people decently. It's just ... decent. You seem to be
determined to be otherwise. Have at it, then. No skin off my nose, or
Page's.
They behave indecently and provocatively by claiming to be the sex
their genes dictate that they are not.Encouragement is unforgivable.
I haven't seen or read of any indecent or provocative behavior on
Page's part.
She has claimed to not be a woman.
That's indecent and provocative,
and your contriving to desensitize
yourself to that fact is likewise.
Post by A FriendYours, yes. So since you insist that you need not treat
these people decently,
No,I AM treating them decently,by insisting they
have the mental capacity and moral obligation to
overcome their madness.
Post by A Friendwhat are you going to do? Point at them at
restaurants and berate them? Trip them on the sidewalk? Call them
"trans-testicles" or some other ridiculous name? I'm curious as to
just how you intend to claim and keep the moral high ground here
because, right now, I don't see much daylight between you and one of
those asshole preachers who give God a bad name.
The moral high ground is maintained by never stooping
to the depravity of validating trangenderism.
Post by A FriendPost by Louis Epstein-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
You know they finished building the new one like a hundred years ago,
right? There are people in it and everything.
They're not completely done with this round of rebuilding,
but anyone who doesn't understand that they absolutely
MUST do it over with bigger buildings needs to be reminded:
-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.